I don’t tend to write reviews of
Doctor Who episodes, simply because I imagine I’ll come across gushing like a fanboy, and I do try to avoid being a real fanboy about anything. I’m an incredibly critical person, very rarely able to say anything is so 100% brilliant that nothing was wrong with it at all — especially not television.
But I am a lifetime fan of
Doctor Who. I remember being introduced to the programme way back in the 80s. Sylvester McCoy was the Doctor back then, and I remember the Doctor and Ace’s adventures for the 3 or so seasons they travelled together. There was something incredibly likeable, dark, and mysterious about McCoy’s Doctor, especially after the initial season of his time playing the part, where the scripts took a much darker, more interesting direction, questioning who the Doctor is and why he travels as he does.
One of my biggest beefs against Russell T. Davies’ reimagined series was that it was clear from the start that the Timelords, that Gallifrey, were no more. I thought, rather naively, to begin with that this would cut out a huge amount of storytelling potential.
I’m happy to admit that I was wrong. While I sometimes think that the new series has kinda missed out on some of the Lore of the series, most of the stuff that I’m thinking of is from the book line anyway that took place before the Doctor Who telemovie, when no
Doctor Who stuff was on air.
I’m thinking
Lungbarrow specifically in many cases, which went a long way to exploring a lot of the mysteries of just who the Doctor is, what he could have been, and why he is who he is; but at the same time introducing yet more mystery to the character. Is he a genetic reproduction of the mysterious Other of Gallifreyan history? Will we ever know?
The new series has been brilliant at these little snippets about the Doctor’s past. Lots and lots of little throwaway comments about his life from all the times we’ve not had him on screen. He’s been a father. He’s not good with weddings. He chose his title for a reason. And now, with this marvellous two-parter from Stephen Moffat, we know that at some point he will (probably) find a soulmate, someone he will trust so implicitly that he will reveal to her his real name.
Looking back at Stephen Moffat’s episodes from the 4 seasons so far, I must admit that I’ve enjoyed each one. Even the
Empty Child/Doctor Dances, which creeped me out a little bit. There’s something remarkably rich and admirable about the way this man tells a story, and I’m now in the fun position of being torn about what my favourite episodes of the series’ are now.
You see, this time last year I would have said “
Blink” was probably the best Doctor Who episode, even if it barely features the Doctor. It was so *clever* and emotional.
The year before, I would have said “
Girl in the Fireplace,” and not just because I think Sophia Myles is incredibly hot. Again, it was fun, it was clever, it had little mysteries to reveal, and it was packed full of emotion.
And then came “
The Sound of Drums” and the 3-part conclusion to season 3. This arc with the Master was beautifully performed, and while I personally thought the third of the three was a slight letdown until the last ten minutes, the joy of seeing the Doctor pitted against the Master, finally seeing a fellow Timelord in the new series, and then having it all taken away by the end was a hugely emotional turning point in the story. Just as the Doctor is coming to terms with his survivor’s guilt, he’s thrown another curveball.
I would have said those were my favourite episodes, until this latest two-parter. They were excellently paced, featured brilliant acting, a “have you quite clicked it yet” plot, several layers of mystery, and yet another curveball for David Tennant’s Doctor. The whole story with Professor River Song and what her relationship with the Doctor is is STILL left deliciously mysterious at the end of the episode. It’s obviously hinted at that the only situation in which the Doctor would reveal his true name to anyone is during a marriage ceremony, but that is never explicitly stated, and that’s just the way I like it.
The Doctor needs to remain mysterious for him to have his appeal. Would we still have the same affection for the character if he was no longer just “The Doctor” and was called by some Gallifreyan name? I doubt it. His circumstances, his past: we need just enough of that hinted at so we know he’s experienced some degree of tragedy so great that he travels simply to cope with the magnitude of it. In Silence in the Library/Forest of Death we get not hints about his past, but hints about his future. Part of me is fascinated by the idea of knowing what happens in those events. How he meets River Song in future and their whole thing happens.
But then part of me doesn’t want to know. Because the conclusion of their story had such a huge dramatic and emotional impact, I’m not sure any revelation of their “first” and subsequent meetings could do the concept justice.
I think one of the reasons this episode resonates so much to me is the idea of being in love with someone who doesn’t know who you are, a concept that forms part of the foundation of my first novel, and kind of slips into the second and third parts of the trilogy too (or will do, when they’re written). It’s actually kinda strange how many of my ideas seem to end up used in episodes of
Doctor Who before I get a chance to publish them — someone must be in my head invading my thoughts and stealing my ideas. Or something.
There is a bit of time travel and reincarnation in the trilogy, as well as an underlying thread that will be revealed by the end of the books. I suppose in a sense I’ve used that Doctor Whovian device as something to drive the story, though my characters have zero control over the method of travel and spend much of the trilogy dealing with paradoxes which hopefully all work in a continuity sense.
But anyways, I was talking about these two episodes. I’ve just watched them again, back-to-back, and I must say I’m looking forwards to two things now:
1) How is Russel T. Davies going to top those two episodes this series — its already well established that Rose is going to return, and stuff is going to hit the fan, but I’ve avoiding reading any spoilers about what might happen next.
2) What is Stephen Moffat going to do with the series when he takes over in 2010 for series 5 (and yes I really REALLY hope that David Tennant is still the Doctor by that point.)
Not really a review is it this... So I’ll give the episodes a score of
9.5/10 — as close to storytelling perfection as I can imagine at this time.
Labels: Reviews